Search for: "Westchester City Civil Service v. Civil Service Employee" Results 41 - 53 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2010, 7:16 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222.However a preliminary consideration was required to be made by the court: did the notice of claim served on Harris' behalf by the union representing employees of School District complied with "notice of claim" requirement set out in Education Law §3813? [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:08 am by Stephen Bilkis
Our offices are conveniently located throughout New York City and we offer free consultations. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:23 am
.  A3747 Ortiz -- Directs the commissioner of correctional services to promulgate rules and regulations providing for inmate reimbursement of expenses of confinement in certain instancesSUMM : Add S601-d, Cor L Directs the commissioner of correctional services to promulgate rules and regulations providing for inmate reimbursement of expenses of confinement in certain instances. 01/29/07 referred to correctionLAW / CORRECTNSA3777 Townsend -- Provides that an… [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:56 pm by My name
Earlier this month a United Kingdom court took their turn on stage in the world-wide Apple v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:27 am
On December 3, 2010, Annabelle Zaratzian filed a civil suit against Adel Ramsey Abadir and Larry M. [read post]
7 May 2007, 2:22 am
First Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CODES Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CODES S5457 THOMPSON -- Relates to the penalty for violating certain provisions requiring a stop at a railroad crossing Same as A 6300 BLURB : V & T L. penalty rr crossing First Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION S5458 THOMPSON -- Makes causing physical injury to a… [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
The location of the lawsuit is where the corporate headquarters of the internet service provider (ISP) is located. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
In fact, as was set forth in the OCA's answer to the petition, the health insurance cause of action must be dismissed for failure to join a necessary party because the real party in interest is the president of the Civil Service Commission, who negotiates health insurance packages on behalf of the Judiciary. [read post]