Search for: "Wester v. Wester"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2007, 2:18 am
Wester v Borland “A trustee seeking to exercise his power of lien over a trust fund had to demonstrate that there were substantial grounds upon which to do so and that he had taken all reasonable steps to ascertain his liability. [read post]
RICHARD S. PHILLIPS AND THE PHILLIPS LAW FIRM, P.A. v. DANIEL COX AND COX LAW CENTER, L.L.C., et al.
25 Nov 2018, 5:02 pm
Civil litigation — Discovery failure — Attorney’s fees In this case, the Circuit Court for Talbot County granted appellee Mark Wester’s motion to compel discovery, and entered judgment in the amount of $980.50 in favor of his attorneys, appellees Daniel Cox and the Cox Law Center, LLC (“Cox”), and against Jessica Wester’s attorneys, appellants Richard ... [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:58 am
US v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 5:41 pm
The Eleventh Circuit today in US v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:01 am
In the case of Griffith v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
See, e.g., Frost v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:52 am
Contrary to the plaintiff's assertion, there was no evidence of any continuous ongoing relationship between the plaintiff and the defendants after the file was returned and, therefore, the continuous representation doctrine is not applicable (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 168-171; Marro v Handwerker, Marchelos & Gayner, 1 AD3d 488; Daniels v Lebit, 299 AD2d 310; Wester v Sussman, 287 AD2d 618). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:51 am
Contrary to the plaintiff's assertion, there was no evidence of any continuous ongoing relationship between the plaintiff and the defendants after the file was returned and, therefore, the continuous representation doctrine is not applicable (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 168-171; Marro v Handwerker, Marchelos & Gayner, 1 AD3d 488; Daniels v Lebit, 299 AD2d 310; Wester v Sussman, 287 AD2d 618). [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 2:49 am
See Rubens, 527 F.3d at 255; Wester, 757 N.Y.S. 2d at 501. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 9:13 pm
This argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 8:23 am
Mechanik Nuccio Hearne & Wester, P.A., 125 So.3d 1034, 1041 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (quoting Padow v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 8:23 am
Mechanik Nuccio Hearne & Wester, P.A., 125 So.3d 1034, 1041 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (quoting Padow v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:48 am
Citing Crow v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm
Ashcroft v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:31 am
Over twenty years ago, in the case of Starr v. [read post]
