Search for: "Western Watersheds Project v. U.S. Department of Interior"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm
Jun 7: In the U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm
Department of the Interior, et al. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 8:21 am
In Western Watersheds Project v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The department and the U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Salmon Protection & Watershed Network v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Salmon Protection & Watershed Network v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
Photo from Arizona Game and Fish Department *** The Wilderness Society v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
Ninth Circuit rules for solar project in WWP appeal (text below) Undeterred by arguments that desert tortoises were at risk, the Ninth Circuit affirmed a lower court judgment in favor of a solar project in California’s Mojave Desert (Western Watersheds Project v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Department of Water Resources, S258574. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Department of Water Resources, S258574. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
County of Mono v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Thornburg of Asheville, N.C., who had declared the plants a “public nuisance” because of their effect on air quality in North Carolina’s scenic western mountains. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The amount includes projects already under way and new construction required by the settlement reached between the city, U.S. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The EPA and health department had sued the companies, claiming the slag-dumping process at the mill violates the federal Clean Air Act. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Charlotte Observer, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. has agreed to pay a $4 million penalty for a 2005 chlorine and diesel fuel spill that killed nine people and polluted a creek in western South Carolina, the federal government said Monday. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
As part of the settlement, Westar will also spend $6 million on environmental mitigation projects. [read post]
