Search for: "Whalen v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2010, 11:56 am by Daniel Solove
The Constitutional Right to Information Privacy In Whalen v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:58 am by Eugene Volokh
Such question presumptively violated a constitutional right to privacy discussed by the Supreme Court in Whalen v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 1:36 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITEmployment LawFree With Registration: Bank's Loan Analysts Entitled to Overtime Pay, Circuit Rules Whalen v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 1:40 am
State Board for Professional Medical Conduct APPELLATE TERMFamily Law Transgendered Petitioner Is Granted Reversal Of Prior Court Order Denying Name Change Matter of Winn-Ritzenberg NEW YORK COUNTYTorts Motorist Raises Triable Issue of Whether Readily Observable Manifestation of Decay in Tree Existed Whalen v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 7:47 am
" The answer according to State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
" [Matter of Capital Newspapers v Whalen, 69 NY2d 246, emphasis supplied].In other words, when faced with a FOIL request, an agency must either provide the record sought, deny the request and indicate the specific exemption to disclosure it is relying upon justifying such refusal, or certify that it does not possess the requested document and that it could not be located after a diligent search. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 3:57 am
Frischenmeyer, No. 99,975 (Feb. 13, 2009); Sam Kepfield; and State v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:11 am
Selection of one of available alternative remedies provided by the State's Human Right Law bars recourse to the otherTierney v Patchogue Fire Dept. [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:23 am
  Oh, by the way, did I mention that father had moved out of state? [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court:… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
"FOIL is to be liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Matter of Capital Newspapers v Whalen, 69 NY2d 246, 252; see Buffalo News, Inc. v Buffalo Enterprise Dev. [read post]