Search for: "Whiskey Cases"
Results 61 - 80
of 586
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2023, 6:39 am
That’s not the case (Joan Biskupic, CNN) Supreme Court gets the scoop on doggy toy, whiskey parody case (Mark Walsh, ABA Journal) Schumer hopes to see student loan forgiveness follow through, Supreme Court seems unlikely to (Ava Pukatch, WRVO) Senators relaunch bill seeking to force Supreme Court to televise sessions (Dan Mangan, CNBC) The post The morning read for Friday, March 17 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
Our first clue might have been that the company insists that its booze is "Tennessee whiskey" rather than bourbon. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
They point to the 1994 Supreme Court case of Campbell v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 9:15 am
Supreme Court on Friday, March 10, in a major trademark case set to be argued on March 22. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 9:15 am
Supreme Court on Friday, March 10, in a major trademark case set to be argued on March 22. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:37 am
Here are three recent TTAB rulings in three inter partes proceedings: a Section 2(d) case, a Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness case, and a Section 2(f) case. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 12:37 pm
VIP Products, Jack Daniels claims that a company infringed and diluted its trademarks by selling a parody dog toy that looks like a Jack Daniels whiskey bottle and has punny text like “BAD SPANIELS – 43% POO BY VOL. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Bathtub gin was made from high-proof alcohol, glycerin, water, juniper, and, in some cases, the deadly additive of wood alcohol. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:35 pm
For those who don’t know, Jack Daniels is a form of Whiskey. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:54 am
In this case, Jack Daniel’s claimed that a dog toy manufacturer (VIP Products) produced a dog toy called the “Bad Spaniels” which is shaped like a Jack Daniel’s whiskey bottle and displays a label that allegedly infringes upon Jack Daniel’s trade dress. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
Below is a brief preview of the cases before the Court: Gonzalez v. [read post]
The Briefing by the IP Law Blog: Supreme Court Takes Up Jack Daniel’s-Bad Spaniels Trademark Dispute
6 Jan 2023, 3:51 pm
The Supreme Court granted Jack Daniel’s petition for certiorari and will hear the trademark infringement case involving a parody dog chew toy that resembles the Jack Daniel’s Whiskey Bottle. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:03 am
Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:42 am
The trademark case involves a dog toy, “Bad Spaniels,” that imitates a Jack Daniel’s whiskey bottle and asks the Court to clarify where courts should draw the line between parody and trademark infringement. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:28 pm
VIP created and sells a chew toy modeled after the Jack Daniel’s iconic whiskey bottle. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:37 am
Jack Daniel’s Old No. 7 Black Label Tennessee Whiskey (left) and VIP’s Bad Spaniels Silly Squeakers dog toy (right). [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 8:00 am
The attorney handling this tragic case for the Schlutt estate was Sean W. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:20 am
VIP contends that these products are a parody and fair use of Jack Daniel’s whiskey product, but Jack Daniel’s believes that the use of their trademark design and trade dress of the whiskey product infringes and dilutes the mark. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 12:50 pm
Supreme Court recently granted Jack Daniel’s petition for review in its case against the makers of “Bad Spaniels,” a dog chew toy that mimics a bottle of Jack Daniel’s whiskey. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 7:14 am
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Supreme Court justices may finally have to decide if the White House can write immigration rules (Joan Biskupic, CNN) Missouri man put to death for killing police officer in 2005 (Jim Salter, The Associated Press) How Whiskey and Chew Toys Dragged the Supreme Court Into a First Amendment Fracas (Matt Ford, The New Republic) The Supreme Court Case That’s All About Donald Trump (Quinta Jurecic, The Atlantic) ABA asks Supreme… [read post]