Search for: "White et al v. Golding et al" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2011, 7:57 am by Jenna Greene
Goncalves et al., which the Department of Justice has described as the largest single prosecution of individuals in the history of FCPA enforcement. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Oklahoma; Certificate of Appealability) In re Gold King Mine Release in San Juan County, Colorado, on August 5, 2015 (CERCLA; Natural Resource Damages) Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Foods that have been sources of contamination include ground beef, venison, sausages, dried (non-cooked) salami, unpasteurized milk and cheese, unpasteurized apple juice and cider (Cody, et al., 1999), orange juice, alfalfa and radish sprouts (Breuer, et al., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
The House of Lords did not pursue this interpretation in Knowsley, largely because Counsel for all parties (including Jan Luba QC) submitted that the then Housing and Regeneration Act would remedy this issue via the replacement tenancy, and in view of the may thousands of cases that had already been based on Thompson et al. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
The House of Lords did not pursue this interpretation in Knowsley, largely because Counsel for all parties (including Jan Luba QC) submitted that the then Housing and Regeneration Act would remedy this issue via the replacement tenancy, and in view of the may thousands of cases that had already been based on Thompson et al. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 2:26 pm by Andrea Shannon (US)
(Dkt. 67), The Board of Regents of the Univ. of Houston System, et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 2:26 pm by Andrea Shannon (US)
(Dkt. 67), The Board of Regents of the Univ. of Houston System, et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
We're supporting Julie Niesen et al.'s memorandum in support of jurisdiction, and asking the Ohio Supreme Court to consider the question, on which we think the Court of Appeals erred. [read post]