Search for: "White v. Department of Defense"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2017, 6:50 am
On September 5, 2017, attorneys for the Justice Department asked the Fifth Circuit to voluntarily dismiss as moot the interlocutory appeal of the preliminary injunction granted in State of Nevada v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:38 am
The Act also made the utilities responsible to provide and pay for SNF storage until the United States Department of Energy (DOE) accepts the material. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:51 am
"Judge Scheindlin found in Yannotti v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm
These decision that can only be made by the defendant, upon the advise of counsel, are whether to plead guilty, whether to waive a jury trial, whether to testify at trial and whether to appeal(Jones v Barnes, at 751; White, at 478)In People v Cosby (2011 NY Slip Op 00925 [4th Dept 2/11/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department considered the question of who is responsible for insuring that the defendant is aware that he and the counsel get to decide whether… [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
Poole, 742 F.Supp. 2d 3323, although the Third Department decision in People v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 7:34 am
Circling back to New York Penal Law 155.30(5), in People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
Ricci v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
Bowers v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 10:38 am
, United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:58 am
George A Whiting Paper Co. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 4:53 am
As the Court notedHaving accepted the assistance of counsel, a defendant retains authority over certain fundamental decisions (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751; People v Colon, 90 NY2d 824, 825; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478, cert denied 493 US 859). [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 4:00 pm
Oregon v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 7:55 am
In Missouri v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:16 pm
The Defense Department has acknowledged “receiv[ing] formal guidance from the White House in reference to transgender personnel serving in the military,” according to Pentagon spokeswoman Dana White. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:16 am
” In arguing that venue may not lie in D.C., Van Grack and Chervak rely on United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 5:19 am
(See Bach v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
The related May 12, 2021, White House fact sheet explained that “requiring providers to share breach information that could impact Government networks is necessary to enable more effective defenses of Federal departments, and to improve the Nation’s cybersecurity as a whole. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:24 pm
Any attorney who has real experience in shoplifting defense can direct you to People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am
… We had representatives of every known right-wing, white supremacist, anti-government group out there. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
District Court in Boston under the name of Gill v. [read post]
