Search for: "White v. Dirks"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
The case of Deckmyn v Vandersteen (Case C-201/13) on parody considers a set of questions related to the right to freedom of expression conflicting with copyright, and the impact of the Information Society (Infosoc) Directive 2001/29. [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:26 pm
This blog highlights and further develops some of the main points of criticism on the EU-ban we formulated earlier in an article in De Juristenkrant, a bi-weekly legal journal in Flanders, Belgium (Dirk Voorhoof, ‘EU legt Russia Today en Sputnik het zwijgen op: twee maten en twee gewichten’, De Juristenkrant 2022/448, 16-17). [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Originally, the SEC defined and justified the prohibition in its 1961 Cady Roberts decision.[4] The Supreme Court substantially modified the SEC’s definition in 1983 in Dirks v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:55 pm
Bazelon, whose features are reminiscent of Christy Turlington's, wore a white v-neck blouse and well-tailored brown sweater. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
Biography: Dirk Lasater is a practicing lawyer in Winston-Salem, NC with an interest in intellectual property issues. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:19 am
As articulated in 1983 by the Supreme Court in Dirks v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
But things did not go smoothly for Ms White. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 4:02 am
TTAB Finds LIkelihood of Confusion but Dismisses Fraud ClaimTest Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is DIRK for Sunglasses Confusable With DIRK BIKKEMSBERG for Spectacles? [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:23 pm
White Getgey & Meyer Co. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:23 pm
White Getgey & Meyer Co. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 12:00 am
She thought the basis of the assessment was broadly consistent with Google v MMIin the US. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 6:21 am
This was the underpinning of an important Supreme Court case thirty years ago – Dirks v SEC – which held that an employee who told a securities analyst about a fraud at the employee’s company had not breached a fiduciary duty to the company (and hence under applicable law the securities analyst could not be prosecuted for insider trading based on this disclosure). [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:54 am
Khan Network 06/26/2008
Letter to Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne From Rep. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm
Readers are reminded that the consultation on the Government’s Online Harms White paper closes at 23:59, 1 July 2019. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:37 pm
” Both of those fundamental questions are at issue in the case of Salazar (Interior Secretary) v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
National Archives Asks Justice Dept. to Investigate Trump’s Handling of White House Records MSN – Matt Zapotosky, Jacqueline Alemany, Ashley Parker, and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 2/9/2022 The National Archives and Records Administration asked the Justice Department to examine Donald Trump’s handling of White House records. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
