Search for: "White v. Nicholls" Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 pm
Reader you may well gasp, but I did.I publicly disagreed with their Lordships, including Lord Nichols, (who had also handed down judgment in the leading matrimonial finance case of White v White in 2000,) and Lady Hale, lately the President of our Supreme Court.I sympathised instead with Mr Alan Miller, who had pursued his case all the way to this grandest court in the land, so aggrieved was he after a short marriage at having to pay his 30 something wife of about… [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
As anticipated, and affirmed in Economou v de Freitas [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) (see our blog here), the new section 4 defence is being interpreted broadly in line with the principles of the common law ‘Reynolds’ privilege (although there remains some debate between practitioners as to the level of  importance to be attributed to each of the old ‘Reynolds criteria’ – Lord Nicholls’ checklist for good practice – in view… [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:29 am
However late comer "Fake Jay White picking for Colby" (yes that's the full name of the team) kept the flag flying with a pick of the Pack. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 12:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Rich people are more likely to acquire IP rights than poor people; whites than minorities in the US; males than females. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Nation, John Nichols identifies a “calculus for blocking Trump’s Court pick. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 12:03 pm
JOHN V GROSS JR ET AL, ATTY NO COUNSEL, PRO SE ET AL STATE OF TEXAS, ATTY HUNT, DANIEL vs. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:32 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Pennsylvania); and the application of habeas corpus standards (White v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Idea/expression dichotomy: Nichols/Learned Hand abstraction test. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
Gerard Magliocca, buoyed by the ACA surviving a second Supreme Court review in King v. [read post]