Search for: "White v. Paulsen"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Ross; Moore v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
In a post earlier today, guest-blogger Mike Paulsen suggests that a cert. petition currently pending before the Supreme Court is redolent of such landmark race-discrimination cases as Brown v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
In a post earlier today, guest-blogger Mike Paulsen suggests that a cert. petition currently pending before the Supreme Court is redolent of such landmark race-discrimination cases as Brown v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 2:59 am
Michigan] “Indispensable Remedy: The Broad Scope of the Constitution’s Impeachment Power” [Gene Healy, Cato white paper and video feature] Michael Stokes Paulsen series at Law and Liberty on impeachment and originalism [introduction, developing a principled constitutional basis for use of the power, digression on Aaron Burr, special considerations of impeaching judges and presidents; on original meaning of “high crimes and misdemeanors” in context of… [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:43 am
Cir. 1994); In re Paulsen, 30 F.3d 1475 (Fed. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
In the meantime, John Doe v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
In the meantime, John Doe v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm
One such honorable conservative is Michael Stokes Paulsen, who has a valuable analysis of the electoral college and the constitutionally-guaranteed autonomy of electors. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:08 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 1:17 pm
Indeed, Brandenburg v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
L. 571-590 (2011).Paulsen, Aurora. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:17 am
The question indirectly came before the Supreme Court in 1870 in a case called Virginia v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
See Baude & Paulsen at 107. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
The authors are two highly conservative, leading legal scholars, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:41 pm
" Chiafalo v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:58 pm
John Carey, William V. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
What they did have in common was a goal: to keep President-elect Lincoln from the White House. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Senate in 2018 (when Draper’s proposal would be sent to DC), or if the President in 2018 is a Democrat, then Draper’s measure might face partisan opposition in the Senate or in the White House (which has the power to veto any such measure), And all of that is to say nothing about how the creation of six Californias might affect the electoral college and partisan presidential politics, an extremely complicated question in its own right. [read post]
