Search for: "White v. State (On motion)" Results 161 - 180 of 2,549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2019, 6:30 pm by Cathi Adinaro
The panel agrees that Bloate v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The legislative history of the TMA, just enacted into law, includes several paragraphs blessing Rogers v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 1:11 pm by WIMS
 A motions panel of this Court denied the motion to dismiss, holding that the Letter was an order subject to review. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 9:01 am by MBettman
On September 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 1:44 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
  The Court did state that it would entertain a motion to sever at the time of trial, if desired by the parties. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]