Search for: "White v. Wynn"
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(Afro-IP) Spain When it comes to IP information, Spanish SMEs will have it easier – SPTO ‘IP Management Support Centre’ (Class 46) Switzerland New Swiss practice puts trademarks at serious risk: trade mark registration in black and white, use in colour (Class 46) Fraudulent use of ‘Swissness’? [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273, 1276-77 (9th Cir. 1981) (preference of clients in South America for dealing with males cannot make sex into a bona fide qualification); Diaz v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273, 1276-77 (9th Cir. 1981) (preference of clients in South America for dealing with males cannot make sex into a bona fide qualification); Diaz v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm
Claim of malicious prosecution for offense of blocking sidewalk could proceed; grant of summary judgment reversed Salley v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 11:36 am
Citing Flowers v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm
(I remember hearing decades ago from my parents that Wisconsin required margarine to be green, which apparently is not true - it could be white under the rule. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am
On June 21, the Court in Lucia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:49 am
In a concurring opinion, Judge James Wynn suggested that U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:53 am
In Summum v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 11:40 am
In a 70-page dissent, Judge Wynn would have found that the warrant was not supported by probable cause due to omissions, mischaracterizations, and unsupported inferences of fact in the affidavit. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Last month, a federal appeals panel gave the back of its hand to Rep. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am
Judge Wynn dissented and would have allowed the estate’s claims to proceed to trial. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
