Search for: "Whiteman, Osterman & Hanna, LLP v Oppitz"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2021, 3:13 am
Defendant’s objections raised after the commencement of this action were untimely and insufficient (see Whiteman, Osterman & Hanna, LLP v Oppitz, 105 AD3d 1162, 1163-1164 [3d Dept 2013]; see also L.E.K. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am
” “Turning first to the April 2022 order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, plaintiff established a prima facie claim for account stated via proof that defendant executed a retainer agreement and that plaintiff regularly sent defendant invoices for her fees and expenses that were retained without objection (see Schlenker v Cascino, 124 AD3d 1152, 1153 [3d Dept 2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 904 [2015]; Whiteman, Osterman &… [read post]
