Search for: "Whitfield v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 8:41 am
" A footnote says, "In State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:26 am
State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:26 am
”) Whitfield v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:39 am
Whitfield that the prosecution gets to make the call, and in State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
An example is provided by People v Whitfield, 158 AD2d 922 [4th Dept 1990], where the prosecution failed to request that the jury could presume defendant’s knowing possession of stolen property from his recent and exclusive possession of the fruits of a crime. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
An example is provided by People v Whitfield, 158 AD2d 922 [4th Dept 1990], where the prosecution failed to request that the jury could presume defendant’s knowing possession of stolen property from his recent and exclusive possession of the fruits of a crime. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:51 am
On November 25, 2013, the jury in TQP Development, LLC v. 1-800-Flowers.com, et al., U.S.D.C., E.D. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:43 am
Expectation of privacy underlies decisions in such cases as United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:02 am
Co. v Whitfield, 61 AD3d 724, 725). [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Whitfield v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 7:17 am
LEXIS 122503, July 30, 2012) and dismissed a claim by a civilly committed atheist that forcing him to participate in various specific sex offender treatment programs violates his free exercise rights and the Establishment Clause.In Whitfield v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
<> Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 6:46 pm
Counsel for the respondent in Whitfield v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:57 am
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidgger weighs in on Whitfield v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Deck and State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:42 am
June — same issue as in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
Meanwhile, an IFP petition, two-time relist Whitfield v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:11 am
Denying JCI’s motion for summary judgment on the disability discrimination claims under the ADA and state law, the court first addressed whether a three-part test from Frengler v GM, a 2012 unpublished Sixth Circuit case, or a five-part test under Whitfield v Tennessee, a 2011 published decision, applied for purposes of a prima facie case. [read post]
