Search for: "Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. State"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2014, 9:36 am
The general policy of New Jersey is that employers do not have a "legitimate interest in preventing competition" by former employees, Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 8:03 am
In addressing the validity of a post-employment restriction preventing an employee from competing against his former employer for a period of 5 years and covering a geographic area encompassing every state “east of the Mississippi”, the New Jersey Supreme Court in Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 8:03 am
In addressing the validity of a post-employment restriction preventing an employee from competing against his former employer for a period of 5 years and covering a geographic area encompassing every state “east of the Mississippi”, the New Jersey Supreme Court in Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 5:10 am
Malady, 264 A.2d 53, 56 (N.J. 1970); and Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 5:10 am
Malady, 264 A.2d 53, 56 (N.J. 1970); and Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:27 am
Malady, 55 N.J. 571 (1970); Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:57 am
Malady, 264 A.2d 53, 56 (N.J. 1970); Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:19 am
Malady (opinion here) and Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
