Search for: "Whittington v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2015, 9:03 am
The Housemans filed suit in Minnesota state court for breach of the Put Contract, but the action was dismissed in February 2012. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm
The chapter on state constitutionalism corresponds to The Federalist’s frequent invocation of “analog[ies] to your own state constitution. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm
v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
But, Primus sees it differently:“I understand 96 seems incongruous,” the legal counsel for Primus, attorney Jeffrey Whittington of Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLC, has said. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
But Primus sees it differently: “I understand 96 seems incongruous,” the legal counsel for Primus, attorney Jeffrey Whittington of Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLC, has said. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 8:55 am
Whittington v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 10:53 am
In Houseman v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 10:57 am
We discuss whether courts made the correct decision in such cases as Windsor v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:50 am
In the recent case (Paller v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
DYNEGY INC. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 3:50 am
According to a theory originally developed in the field of constitutional law (see Solum here, Whittington here - or watch the Federalist Society's 12th Annual Faculty Conference here), the distinction describes the process through which a legal text becomes a coercible legal rule: in the first phase, interpretation, a linguistic meaning is attributed to the text; in the second phase, construction, a normative value is assigned to it. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
RUSK STATE HOSPITAL v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:58 am
The GGW “casebook” accordingly integrates the most important Supreme Court opinions with important state court decisions, public criticisms of U.S. and state Supreme Court decisions, and constitutional debates (taking place in varied venues) about territorial acquisition, the constitutionality of a national bank (Alexander Hamilton v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:50 am
James Bradley Thayer played a role in this (as he did in recovering Pennsylvania Judge John Bannister Gibson’s dissent in Eakin v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
Randy Barnett and Keith Whittington have played prominent roles in the development of the “New Originalism. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 3:19 pm
Michael McConnell writes: “Such is the moral authority of [Brown v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 3:54 pm
" Fashion Fabrics of Iowa v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:00 am
State Of Texas and Wise County, Texas, No. 09-0905. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:30 am
Brian also reviews Wal-Mart v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
Whittington, et al., No. 10-0316 Texas Department of Public Safety v. [read post]
