Search for: "Whittle v. Whittle" Results 1 - 20 of 369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Today, Columbia is honoring Jack Coffee, a leader of securities law scholarship and policy. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am by Federica Paddeu
Editor’s note: This article is part of Just Security’s series on reparation mechanisms in the context of Russia’s war against Ukraine. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 8:13 am by Eric Goldman
Odds are high that Viral DRM will abandon the case or whittle it down to one or just a handful of defendants. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:36 am by Samantha Young
Patent Publication No. 2004/0033280 (“Whittle”), into the specification of the ’911 patent and then not disclosing Whittle to the USPTO as prior art; and (2) UCANN’s litigation counsel, Cooley LLP, purportedly took conflicting positions in its representation of UCANN and another client, GW Pharma (the owner of Whittle). [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:40 am by Eric Goldman
There, the court similarly whittled down the number of references in the call logs for various reasons and also used a potentially dubious denominator.] [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
Our column anticipated that hypocritical lawyers working for Trump would say that the Electoral Count Act is unconstitutional, despite the Supreme Court's reliance on it in Bush v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:15 am by Robert Botkin
On October 22, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments for Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:15 am by Robert Botkin
On October 22, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments for Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Early in law school, you might get a professor who tries to whittle the holding of a case down to its ration decidendi by asking questions which force the student to see that the rule that she has formulated as the "holding" is broader than the facts of the case. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 2:41 am by Frank Cranmer
In Professor Doreen McCalla v Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance Inc & Anor [2021] UKET 1303655/2021, the claimant felt a call to ordination in the Church of England and went through its Discernment of Vocations Process between February 2016 and June 2021 but was rejected for training. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
EPA and more in the concerns animating Justice Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]