Search for: "Wickard v. U.s" Results 81 - 100 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2013, 9:30 am by Neil Siegel
Collective action federalism also offers a multi-generational synthesis of almost all of the Supreme Court’s Commerce Clause decisions since 1937, explaining why Wickard v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by Orin Kerr
See Lottery Case, 188 U.S. 321, No. 10–2388 Thomas More Law Center, et al. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:38 am by Transplanted Lawyer
  Seems to me that the "beyond the commerce power" ship sailed sixty-eight years ago with the case of Wickard v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm by Elizabeth Price Foley
  Limited government:  Commerce and the Necessary and Proper Clauses In Wickard v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:00 am by JB
Darby, and Wickard v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:33 am by Big Tent Democrat
Lopez, 514 U.S. at 571 (Kennedy, J., concurring); see Wickard, 317 U.S. at 120 (explaining that Congress? [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:08 pm by Scott C. Idleman
As the Court remarked in the 1942 decision of Wickard v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 10:52 am by Richard Primus
  But I do think that Congress has legislative power at least as broad as indicated in decisions like Wickard v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 am by Neil Siegel, guest-blogging
  That is, collective action federalism offers a way to distinguish the “truly national” from the “truly local” in the context of the Commerce Clause, justifying the outcomes in Wickard v. [read post]