Search for: "Wife K. v. Husband K."
Results 281 - 300
of 351
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division.Dissolution of marriage -- Attorney's fees -- Trial court abused its discretion in denying wife's requests for attorney's fees and costs where husband has ability to pay and requiring wife to pay her own fees would result in diminution of her equitable distribution funds -- Equitable distribution -- Marital/nonmarital assets -- Trial court erred in finding that property acquired by limited… [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:18 pm
Have some sympathy for Family Court Judge Leslie K. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 9:53 am
Joan Mack v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:43 pm
Lewin (a/k/a Baehr v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 9:34 pm
In the Appeal of Richard L. and Kathleen K. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:34 am
In joint cases filed under section 302 of this title and individual cases filed under section 301 or 303 of this title by or against debtors who are husband and wife, and whose estates are ordered to be jointly administered under Rule 1015(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, one debtor may not elect to exempt property listed in paragraph (2) and the other debtor elect to exempt property listed in paragraph (3) of this subsection. [read post]
28 May 2010, 3:25 am
The issues in the case were: how to classify the significant interest income generated from Husband's pre-marital, and thus separate, retirement asset; and what date to use for division of the parties' IRA.Coming into the marriage, Husband had invested approximately $15,000 in his Ford Motor Company 401(k) plan. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:33 am
The issues in the case were: how to classify the significant interest income generated from Husband's pre-marital, and thus separate, retirement asset; and what date to use for division of the parties' IRA.Coming into the marriage, Husband had invested approximately $15,000 in his Ford Motor Company 401(k) plan. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
Graham v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
Federal law exposing the husband’s interest to forfeiture was clear, but the District Court had to refer to state law to determine the nature of the property interests owned by the husband and wife. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
Federal law exposing the husband’s interest to forfeiture was clear, but the District Court had to refer to state law to determine the nature of the property interests owned by the husband and wife. 755 F.Supp. at 171. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm
Jointly-owned property, property in trust, life insurance proceeds and property with a named beneficiary, such as IRAs or 401(k) plans, all pass outside of probate. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 11:13 pm
Andrew and Danielle are husband and wife attorneys, professional speakers and consultants across the country. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 8:03 am
Paul K. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
In Mekhail, plaintiff-wife sued defendant-husband for divorce on October 9, 2007. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
You can wrap it around you for warmth as you bound across the cold moons of Jaglan Beta; you can lie on it on the brilliant marble-sanded beaches of Santraginus V, inhaling the heady sea vapors; you can sleep under it beneath the stars which shine so redly on the desert world of Kakrafoon; use it to sail a miniraft down the slow heavy River Moth; wet it for use in hand-to-hand-combat; wrap it round your head to ward off noxious fumes or avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of… [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
You can wrap it around you for warmth as you bound across the cold moons of Jaglan Beta; you can lie on it on the brilliant marble-sanded beaches of Santraginus V, inhaling the heady sea vapors; you can sleep under it beneath the stars which shine so redly on the desert world of Kakrafoon; use it to sail a miniraft down the slow heavy River Moth; wet it for use in hand-to-hand-combat; wrap it round your head to ward off noxious fumes or avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of… [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 4:10 am
See White v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 7:46 am
That is exactly what is going on in Isaacson v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 12:40 pm
This change allows the spouses of those killed by the carelessness or rule-breaking of others to seek redress for the loss of companionship of their husband or wife. [read post]
