Search for: "Wife K. v. Husband K."
Results 161 - 180
of 350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
Act V, scene III. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 1:14 pm
The facts of the case were egregious: The Plaintiff’s late husband, John K. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:33 pm
CAYEA a/k/a LORI CAYEA, Appellants, v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
It was further discovered that on or about March 10, 2013, the wife changed her designation of the husband as the sole named beneficiary on her Prudential life insurance policy to the husband as a 1% primary beneficiary, the parties’ daughter K. as a 49% beneficiary and daughter R. as a 50% beneficiary. [read post]
20 May 2014, 10:31 am
K. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Rul. 2013-17, which held: For Federal tax purposes, the terms “spouse,” “husband and wife,” “husband,” and “wife” include an individual married to a person of the same sex if the individuals are lawfully married under state law, and the term “marriage” includes such a marriage between individuals of the same sex; For Federal tax purposes, the IRS adopts a general rule recognizing a marriage of… [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:18 am
Did you fu*k anyone he knows, I don’t see why he would ask you that if he didn’t think you did. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm
JOHN K. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
If it concerns a personal matter, please contact my wife. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
Courts have held there was a specific intent to injury in cases where a bankrupt intentionally drove his car into his daughter and her boyfriend: Sangha, Re, 2004 BCSC 799; where a bankrupt husband assaulted his wife: Winfield v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 2:00 pm
In their statements of current net worth, the husband’s 401(k) was now valued at $620,490.00 and the wife’s plan at $14,224.73. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
Macy v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Similarly, it was held by White Plains City Court Judge Andrew K. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 9:49 am
Moyer, a/k/a Brogden v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:24 pm
” Marino v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
Case Name: TERRY MINER and COLLEEN MINER, Husband and Wife v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
Rul. 2013-17, which held: For Federal tax purposes, the terms “spouse,” “husband and wife,” “husband,” and “wife” include an individual married to a person of the same sex if the individuals are lawfully married under state law, and the term “marriage” includes such a marriage between individuals of the same sex; For Federal tax purposes, the IRS adopts a general rule recognizing a marriage of… [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 10:31 am
In Charles Schwab v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm
Current rules give unfair advantage to mass-litigation attorneys targeting Texas consumersLabeau v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:34 am
-Shelli K. 20. [read post]
