Search for: "Wiggins v. Social Security" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am by Mark Zamora
Wiggins, 113 Ga. 149 (3) (1884); Bennett v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 11:24 am by Justin Walsh
” Read more: http://www.theolympian.com/2010/06/08/v-print/1265042/trial-lawyer-wants-to-take-on.html#ixzz0qNhHRlYs?? [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am by INFORRM
Detective Inspector Vicky Vessey said: “The utter disdain he has for the people he targets to steal from is abundantly clear from the lyrics in his social media post. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 3:59 pm
Peffer: Marxism, Morality, and Social Justice (1990). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
There are a number of resolved complaints since last week, including the Met Office v The Daily Telegraph (over the accuracy of claims about the Met’s ability to predict the weather); Richard Ottaway MP v The Daily Telegraph (clause 1, accuracy) and the British Association of Social Workers v Community Care (clause 1, accuracy). [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm by Aurora Barnes
§ 406(b)’s 25-percent cap related to the representation of individuals claiming Social Security benefits include, as the U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am by INFORRM
On the same day Julian Knowles J handed down judgment in the libel case of Fox v Wiggins & Ors [2019] EWHC 2713 (QB). [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm by Mark Zamora
Wiggins, 113 Ga. 149 (3) (1884); Bennett v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
Wiggin LLP published a Media Law Round Up, reviewing the case law and legislative developments in 2023. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
That case involves a provision of the Social Security Act providing that: Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant … who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
Wiggins, 113 Ga. 149 (3) (1884); Bennett v. [read post]