Search for: "Wikileaks.Org"
Results 81 - 100
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2008, 2:02 am
Subscription needed for online access:
WEB-ONLY | Civil liberties groups step into 'Wikileaks' Web site case"The American Civil Liberties Union in Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation have stepped into a mushrooming first amendment fight over a federal judge's order shutting down Wikileaks.org, a Web site known for anonymous posting of confidential government and corporate documents.'WEB-ONLY |… [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 11:50 am
A second order, however, compelled Dynadot, through which Wikileaks had registered the domain name wikileaks.org, to freeze the domain name wikileaks.org (so that it could not be moved to a different registrar) and disabled the name so that it could not refer to anything more than a blank page. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:11 am
However, the agreement signed by the judge to disable the entire wikileaks.org domain name because of the bank documents posted there was harsh, overbroad, and an affront to the right of the public to access information. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:26 am
However, if Julius Baer is concerned with the posting of its confidential documents on the wikileaks.org web site, it could have sought a more narrow remedy than seeking to have the entire wikileaks.org web site shut down. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 12:30 pm
District Jeffrey White that two orders he issued to take wikileaks.org off the Internet were a prior restraint on free speech that violated the First Amendment.Read the article: Los Angeles Times [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:47 am
The bank’s lawyers managed to persuade a US federal judge, Jeffrey White, that the first amendment of the US Constitution had no meaning, obtaining an injunction and follow-up order that, among other things, required blocking the visibility of the domain wikileaks.org in the internet’s Domain Name System (DNS). [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:47 am
The Windypundit gives us a refresher course on why shutting down wikileaks.org hasn’t shut down the actual website. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
On February 15, 2008, a federal trial judge in San Francisco ordered that wikileaks.org be closed. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 10:22 am
That's the second line of this NYT editorial. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 3:20 am
A federal judge in California has pulled the plug on Wikileaks.org, a Web site that specializes in posting leaked documents often provided by whistleblowers. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:31 am
In his lone post this morning, Scott Greenfield writes about a federal judge's attempt to shut down Wikileaks by "directing the Web site's Internet domain registrar to disable the wikileaks.org domain". [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:30 pm
The orders require the domain name registrar, Dynadot, to point the wikileaks.org domain name to an empty page. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 5:04 am
A federal judge last week ordered the disabling of Wikileaks.org, a muckraking Web site. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 12:03 am
A Swiss bank, Julius Baer, asked the court to order removal of several hundred documents posted on Wikileaks.org that purport to be about its offshore activities. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 9:03 pm
White of Federal District Court in San Francisco granted a permanent injunction ordering Dynadot, the site’s domain name registrar, to disable the Wikileaks.org domain name. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 5:17 pm
A federal judge issued an injunction last week ordering a California domain registrar to block access to Wikileaks.org, a website that posts leaked materials, the New York Times reports. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 7:42 am
However, if Julius Baer is concerned with the posting of its confidential documents on the wikileaks.org web site, it could have sought a more narrow remedy than seeking to have the entire wikileaks.org web site shut down. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 5:28 am
A Swiss bank, Julius Baer, asked the court to order removal of several hundred documents posted on Wikileaks.org that purport to be about its offshore activities. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:27 pm
” This order, which appears to be the result of a stipulation between the plaintiffs and Dynadot, Wikileaks’ domain name registrar and web host, required that Dynadot immediately disable the entire wikileaks.org domain name and account and remove all DNS hosting records.Later that same day, the court issued an Amended Temporary Restraining Order that drops the requirement that Dynadot disable the entire Wikileaks.org domain. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:18 pm
That means that someone paid Dynadot around ten dollars a year to register wikileaks.org and point it towards a web server somewhere. [read post]
