Search for: "Wildlife Preservation, LLC"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
As to a third plant, a special status species, the appellate court also found that the administrative record contained sufficient evidence to support a fair argument that mitigation through onsite preservation or offsite restoration may not succeed, and therefore there may be a significant impact. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am
Jackson Masonry, LLC, and County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:15 pm
Frontier Stone, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
This case is potentially at odds with the decision in Georgetown Preservation Society v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:36 am
(Tribal Colleges; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) FSS Development CO., LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:54 pm
(Tribal Colleges; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) FSS Development CO., LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:00 am
Leger Law & Strategy, LLC Associate Attorney, Santa Fe, N.M. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 17-71, and Markle Interests, LLC. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
(See 12/11/17 post; see also POET, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2017 Annual CEQA update. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:26 pm
” The Court found support for its view in Preserve Wild Santee v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm
City of Newport Beach (Newport Banning Ranch LLC, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2017) ___ Cal.5th ___. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) Did the City's approval of the project at issue comport with the directives in its general plan to "coordinate with" and "work with" the California Coastal Commission to identify habitats for preservation, restoration, or development prior to project approval? [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:08 am
PSEG Long Island LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (Anheuser-Busch, LLC, Real Party in Interest) (4th Dist., Div. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 4:31 pm
In 2004, respondents Preserve Associates, LLC, Big Tupper, LLC, Tupper Lake Boat Club, LLC and Nancy Hull Godshall, (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “developers”), submitted an application to respondent Adirondack Park Agency (“APA”) for approval of the proposed Adirondack Club and Resort to be located on privately-owned land in the Town of Tupper Lake, Franklin County. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:21 pm
Leflar; Law Clerk, McMath Woods, P.A.; Public Interest Extern, Attorney General for the Cherokee Nation; Corporate Extern, Walmart Stores, Inc.; Law Clerk, Mostyn Prettyman; Pro Bono Law Clerk, Legal Aid of Arkansas; Research Intern, Nature Conservancy; Consultant, Arkansas Wildlife FederationDistance LL.M. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
