Search for: "Wilds v. US Postmaster General"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Service are affirmed over claims that: 1) the Wild Bird Act does not apply to captive-bred birds; 2) the Act is unconstitutionally vague because it does not define the term personal pet; and 3) the jury instruction given by the trial court was incorrect. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
And of course AI companies already stress that they have instituted various guardrails that would avoid various outputs (again, however imperfectly); here's an example from OpenAI: Our use case guidelines, content guidelines, and internal detection and response infrastructure were initially oriented towards risks that we anticipated based on internal and external research, such as generation of misleading political content with GPT-3 or generation of malware with… [read post]
