Search for: "Wiley v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., http://t.co/spBpZhVyOw -> UK peer calls for universal Internet delete button, may also want unicorns http://t.co/HtDZNRi1U7 -> Friday’s Endnotes – 07/31/15 http://t.co/0KaLEKGF0D -> Patentable Subject Matter Guidelines for the United States http://t.co/5Bhp08RDiU -> [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:59 am by LTA-Editor
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. implicitly overturns the Federal Circuit precedent Jazz Photo Corp. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:41 am by Steven Buchwald
However, federal courts have squarely rejected this approach holding that “the bare assignment of the right to sue cannot confer standing”((John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
 But while the Costco suit was under way, the Supreme Court held in 2013, in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, that the first sale doctrine also applies to copies of protected works lawfully manufactured abroad. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
The case then went back to the district court for a determination of damages – but in the meantime, the Court decided the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:16 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Copyright Office filing deadline & benefits of filing promptly V. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 10:27 am by Thomas Kaufman
  The opinion explains the meaning of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]