Search for: "Wilkins, Appeal of" Results 41 - 60 of 376
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2006, 10:20 am
from the diaries of the tennessee dude... so last week i mentioned that chief justice william wilkins of the u.s. court of appeals recently stated that, "I think politically, you're not going to find a candidate running on 'Let's do away with the death penalty,"...and he followed that w/the opinion that no one in south carolina could be elected to statewide office opposing the death... [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:07 am by Jeanne M. Hannah
Wilkins, Docket No. 22A01-1109-DR-411 (Indiana Court of Appeals, June 15, 2012) [For Publication] that the trial court could not consider an18-year-old daughter's income and ability to provide for herself when determining amount of child support which father was required to continue to pay. [read post]
20 Sep 2006, 10:05 am
from the diaries of the tennessee dude... chief justice william wilkins of the u.s. court of appeals for the 4th circuit recently spoke about the death penalty to a gathering at the charleston school of law in south carolina...he commented that decision-makers will have to evaluate whether the punishment is worth its increasing financial costs...but he also noted how difficult it is... [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
Mace III and Nicole Nicolette Mace, who handle federal and state criminal appeals, recently argued a case in front of Judge Duncan, Judge Niemeyer, and Senior Judge Wilkins of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 11:33 am by Mack Sperling
That seat was formerly held by Judge William Wilkins of South Carolina and is still warm, as Judge Wilkins retired only a couple of years ago, in 2007. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 6:17 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
In so holding, we need not reach Wilkins' additional arguments that the phrase "thwart or interfere in any manner with the orderly administration of justice" in K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 21-5909(a) is unconstitutionally vague and the Court of Appeals decision rejecting this argument. [read post]
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cited both Block and Mottaz in its Wilkins ruling, stating that the court did not have subject matter jurisdiction in the case. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:02 am by Gordon M. Orloff
Judge Wilkins held that the Planning Board's response was not governed by the appeals process set forth in M.G.L. c. 41, §81BB, which provides for a 20-day appeal period after a planning board decision gets filed with the town clerk. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:02 am by Gordon M. Orloff
Judge Wilkins held that the Planning Board's response was not governed by the appeals process set forth in M.G.L. c. 41, §81BB, which provides for a 20-day appeal period after a planning board decision gets filed with the town clerk. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:40 am by Michael Kraut
The three-judge panel from California’s Second District Court of Appeal agreed. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 11:27 am
Circuit Judge Robert Wilkins wrote, adding that “no extraordinary circumstance beyond his control” prevented Young from filing his petition within 60 days in the proper court.Meanwhile, back home in California, for an unpub'd decision on appealability and appellate standing, from 1/4, read this one. [read post]