Search for: "Will Thomas v. State of Indiana" Results 1 - 20 of 575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
However, the ruling is promising for out-of-state companies wishing to operate as public utilities in Indiana, as such entities currently face a comparable citizenship hurdle under Indiana law. [1] In Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Indiana confirms that state governments, like their federal counterpart, may not impose excessive fines. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 11:45 am by Tom Smith
Thomas had argued, “this [Indiana] law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” Concurring Opinion in Box v Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc Justice Clarence Thomas issued a concurring opinion. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 8:58 am
From the Indiana Lawyer, an article on the recent Indiana Supreme Court decision:The state's eminent domain statute allows Indiana municipalities to acquire operations of privately owned water and sewer utilities that serve recently annexed portions of that community, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled today.The split 3-2 decision came in Utility Center, Inc., d/b/a Aquasource v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:13 am by Marcia Oddi
State of Indiana , a 16-page opinion, Judge Kirsch writes:Thomas... [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:21 pm by Marcia Oddi
For publication opinions today (3): In John Thomas Pontius v. [read post]