Search for: "Will v. People"
Results 281 - 300
of 72,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2014, 12:21 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 9:33 am
He says he should get custody credit too; it makes no sense to treat people who make bail but are then released and confined to their home any different than people who can't make bail but are then released and confined to their home.And the Court of Appeal agrees with him.Mind you, for Gerson himself, this only knocks a couple of years off his nearly 34-year sentence.But still, it's an important decision overall. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
On July 31, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a 4-3 opinion in People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 8:55 pm
Here is the abstract: In 2020 the Australian High Court decided the case of Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth, a claim of constitutional belonging by two Aboriginal men. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:53 pm
In People v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 10:46 am
People disagree about the merits sometime. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 2:37 pm
You might not always have been insane; after all, even the most nutty of people tend to have periods of lucidity. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
Over the weekend I wrote about Lodi v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 12:42 pm
In a 10-page decision in Scorpio Music S.A. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:32 pm
Defendant's upset because it's a three-bunk cell already occupied by three people, and there's allegedly only two people in a cell on a lower tier. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 7:26 am
In People v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:48 pm
V. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:49 pm
Definitely not worth appealing.For normal people, anyway. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 7:38 am
Continue reading The post Accurint v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:40 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 4:57 am
by Jill Paperno, First Assistant Public Defender and author of Representing the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseAmong some of yesterday's disappointing Court of Appeals decisions there is one that can be useful to us - People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 1:39 am
Supreme People's Court of the Peoples' Republic of ChinaAuthor ONUnicorn Licence CC BY-SA 3.0 Source Wikimedia Common Jane LambertPatents Court (HH Judge Hacon) Nokia Technologies OY and another v Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd and others (Rev1) [2021] EWHC 2952 (Pat) (4 Nov 2021)This was an application to HH Judge Hacon sitting as a judge of the Patents Court to set aside service of [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:45 pm
Including a variety of interesting people and hotspots. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:05 am
In the aftermath of the recent decision from the Court of Appeals of New York in People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 4:03 am
We agree because the Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
