Search for: "William Davis, II v. Department of State"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
II, § 1, cl. 8; and the Executive Vesting Clause, id. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
II. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Patton State Hospital, State Compensation Insurance Fund, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Davis (Assistant Professor, The University of Alabama), Brendan Nyhan (James O. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
But even these two Justices were forced to address (and ultimately chose to embrace) Smiley, (its predecessor Davis v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:07 am
The second new relist, Davis v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
After all, the first secessionists met in Hartford in 1814, and William Lloyd Garrison famously endorsed “no Union with slaveholders. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 1:15 pm
Professor Davis profiled a similar Order No. 1000 challenge—incidentally, also captioned LSP Transmission Holdings II v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
As I have explained at length, the theory—which holds that elected state legislatures, when regulating federal elections under Articles I and II, are free from state-court enforcement of state constitutional limits on legislative power—is belied by the well-understood meaning of “state legislatures” in 1787, the grammar and syntax of Articles I and II themselves, the clear actions by states right before and right… [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
The State Bar of Texas’ Membership Department was informed in February and March 2021 of the deaths of these members. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
On 3 December 2020 William Davis J handed down judgment in the case of Stokoe Partnership Solicitors v Robinson & Ors [2020] EWHC 3312 (QB). [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Gore litigation—Chief Justice William Rehnquist joined by Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas—that is the modern font of this notion that elected state legislatures are protected from interference by other state bodies with regard to regulation of federal elections. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
Department of Justice (DOJ), which itself is overseen by the President under Article II of the Constitution? [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Family Court Act § 412(2)(d) was amended to read as follows: (d) "income cap" shall mean up to and including one hundred eighty-four thousand dollars of the payor's annual income; provided, however, beginning March first, two thousand twenty and every two years thereafter, the income cap amount shall increase by the sum of the average annual percentage changes in the consumer … [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
For example, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-5239, Davis v. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
William F. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
” As noted above, the Seventh Circuit in Judge v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
United States (argued and briefed as Dalmazzi v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am
Reviving her suit for a second time, the appeals court reversed summary judgment and remanded (Davis v. [read post]
