Search for: "William Eskridge" Results 141 - 160 of 169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2014, 6:29 am by Amy Howe
  This blog’s symposium on the orders continued with posts from Scott Michelman, William Eskridge, Robin Wilson, Dale Carpenter, and John Neiman. [read post]
There are some very good reasons why courts follow the ordinary meaning rule (many of which are outlined in the opening chapter of William Eskridge Jr. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 2:34 pm
” The article will be released on Thursday, Constitution Day, when the Cato Supreme Court Review is released at the Cato Institute’s annual Constitution Day event, which features professors Steven Calabresi and William Eskridge, Walter Olson of Overlawyered, Damon Root of Reason and several VC contributors. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:21 pm by Bridget Crawford
Planning Committee for the 2015 Workshop on Next Generation Issues of Sex, Gender and the Law: Angela Onwuachi-Willig, University of Iowa College of Law, Chair William Eskridge, Yale Law School Aya Gruber, University of Colorado School of Law Kimberly Yuracko, Northwestern University School of Law Rebecca Zietlow, University of Toledo College of Law [read post]
10 Dec 2012, 5:48 am by Marissa Miller
Also at this blog, William Eskridge and Hans Johnson contend that same-sex marriage is having a “Cinderella moment,” while Neal Devins and Tara Grove argue that some petitioners in these cases are not proper parties before the Court. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm by JB
  And they exemplify the ongoing debates over the future of originalism as an approach to constitutional interpretation.The Cato Institute brief, authored by William Eskridge (Yale), Stephen Calabresi (Brown/Northwestern), and Ilya Shapiro (Cato Institute), argues that a constitutional guarantee of same-sex marriage is consistent with the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am by Guest Blogger
  A brieffiled by William Eskridge, John Ferejohn, Charles Fried, Lisa Marshall Manheim and David Strauss explains why a textualist analysis of the law would compel the Court to rule for the government. [read post]
6 May 2020, 11:18 am by Josh Blackman
So have countless progressive scholars and attorneys, including Jack Balkin, William Eskridge, Michael Gerhardt, Heather Gerken, Neal Katyal, Reva Siegel, Geoffrey Stone, Nadine Strossen, and Laurence Tribe.12 Judicial membership in such organizations should be encouraged, not banned. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:44 am by David Cruz
This prediction is not new; many, including my friend and fellow symposium participant Bill Eskridge, have made it.  [read post]
Late last month, a federal trial court in Texas issued a nationwide order preventing the federal Department of Education (DOE), as well as a number of other federal agencies, from enforcing—anywhere in the country—their “interpretation of the definition of ‘sex’ in the various written directives … as applied to Title IX … and Title VII” (which are federal laws that prohibit certain entities from discriminating on the basis of sex). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
., Larry Catá Backer, “Retaining Judicial Authority: A Preliminary Inquiry on the Dominion of Judges“, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 12(1):117-178 (2003)(juridical authority and the cultivation of the techniques of neutrality)). [read post]