Search for: "Williams (charles) v. U.s"
Results 1 - 20
of 500
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Rev. 965 (2017); Atherton v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999); Weisgram v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
William S. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:32 am
Hilliard, whose father was the well-known Boston printer and bookseller William Hilliard, was in a literal sense born and raised in the printing business. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” [34] There were still cases like Brown v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Board of Education, the historian, former assistant U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am
” The U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:35 am
William R. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
” U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Charles A. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
White pharmacist Charles C. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
We hesitate to say that this procedural anomaly is unique in the U.S. legal system, but we are aware of no analog. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Kastenberg, Goldwater v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
The Commerce Clause, in Nation and States,” at the U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
SB 261 would embrace a considerably larger universe than the proposed SEC rules because it would cover all large companies, not just the public reporting ones under the SEC’s jurisdiction.[16] Most U.S. [read post]
