Search for: "Williams v. Alexander" Results 41 - 60 of 473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 182-203, Dec. 2022).Saud M. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm by admin
Mass torts are created much as cancer occurs in humans. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:50 pm by Scott Bomboy
In 1837, outgoing President Andrew Jackson nominated William Smith of Alabama to the court. [read post]
A dissenting judge argued that one of the patents contained plausibly valid claims that recited technical improvements to a graphical user interface (International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 12:15 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
Geofabrics Limited v Fiberweb Geosynthetics Limited [2022] EWHC 2363 (Pat) Geofabrics Limited (“Geofabrics”) has been awarded £13.4 million in damages for patent infringement, concluding a 5 year long dispute with Fiberweb Geosynthetics Limited (“Fiberweb”). [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:53 pm by Mark Walsh
Josh Gerstein of Politico, with his colleague Alexander Ward, broke the story of the leaked draft opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Anyone reading Federalist 1 might be forgiven for thinking that it was written by Thomas Jefferson (and not Alexander Hamilton) inasmuch as it is suffused with a faith in “the people” and their capacity for disciplined “reflection” and then wise “choice. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 4:30 am by Jonathan Ross (Bristows)
The judge considered the factors on secondary indications set out by Laddie J in Haberman v Jackel [1999] F.S.R. 683 (and approved by Jacob LJ in Schlumberger v Electromagnetic Geoservices [2010] EWC Civ 819). [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:36 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Marc DeGirolami
Or consider the doctrine of state sovereign immunity, which the Court said in Alden v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 8:13 am by Eugene Volokh
K.D. v D.D., officially released today by the Appellate Court of Connecticut, in an opinion by Judge Douglas Lavine, joined by Chief Judge William Bright and then-Judge Joan Alexander, involved a restraining order obtained by a divorcing wife against her husband: [The plaintiff wife] testified that on the evening of June 24, 2021, she went to a restaurant with a group of others, including friends of the defendant. [read post]
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
Williams: Type of police questioning beyond routine interrogation also triggers the right to counsel. 1979 Scott v. [read post]