Search for: "Williams v. Booker"
Results 81 - 100
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2006, 9:41 am
In doing so the Court noted that under U.S. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 2:48 am
See Bradley v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 4:49 am
Kavanaugh wrote about the practice here in a thoughtful concurrence (in denying en banc review) shortly after Blakely and Booker. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:29 pm
On Friday, the Seventh Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 12:29 pm
Booker. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
Today’s second argument is in Ohio v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:49 pm
Cal.); Williams v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 3:56 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The 1946 Supreme Court decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 10:01 pm
Booker is a Two-Way Street: In U.S. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 10:29 am
Williams, No. 08-12360, 2009 WL 624073 (11th Cir., Mar. 12, 2009); U.S. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 12:03 pm
Senator Dianne Feinstein followed a similar line, asking whether Barrett believed Roe v. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 8:53 pm
Booker, making the federal sentencing guideline system advisory rather than mandatory. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
United States, 17-5965, Williams v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
See Battle Creek Health Sys. v. [read post]
