Search for: "Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
As my co-author (Akhil Amar) and I discuss in an Article forthcoming in The Supreme Court Review (a draft of which is available on SSRN here), recent attention concerning ISL theory may have been generated by members of the Supreme Court itself; four Justices, drawing on arguments advanced in the Bush v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Trump prioritized this argument in his briefs to the Court, drawing primarily on the scholarship of Seth Barrett Tillman and his co-author, Josh Blackman. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 12:23 pm
Read his amicus brief in Lawrence v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 9:27 pm
" William Hawkins' 1714 A Treatise of the Pleas of the Crown was very influential on both sides of the Atlantic. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 2:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
It has chased away much darkness from the civilized parts of the world, and spread light and knowledge in our path. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
The task of funding government services belongs to the legislature, not the courts:[This] is a proper subject for Congressional action, not for any creative power of ours. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
In Bostock v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Upon completing her clerkship, in 1988, Kagan went to work as an associate at Williams & Connolly in Washington, D.C. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Bancorp Mortgage Co. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
” Though many other definitions of the word exist, in light of the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in AT&T v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” And Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, “asserted on Sunday that Roe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Duke Power Co. that an employment practice that results in a racially disparate impact constitutes a violation of Title VII’s prohibition on racial discrimination in employment, regardless of whether there was any discriminatory intent. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
