Search for: "Williams v. Common Pleas Court" Results 81 - 100 of 280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
RIFFLE Appellant, Peter Riffle, appeals from the decision of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 5:10 am by MBettman
In November, 2013, Wilson filed a breach of contract claim against Lawrence in the Cuyahoga Court of Common Pleas for monies due on the unpaid contract. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
BEACHAM Defendant-Appellant, Donald Beacham, appeals from the judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, concluding that there was insufficient time to rehabilitate him in the juvenile system and relinquishing jurisdiction to the General Division. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm by Mark Ashton
William Penn Broadcasting, a 1967 decision by the Supreme Court. 233 A.2d 519. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:32 am by MBettman
Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Holbrook held that the banks were victims of Allen’s forgery and ordered Allen to pay restitution to the banks for the amounts paid on the forged checks. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:00 am by Stephanie Zable
The decision followed from the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling Johnson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 3:52 am
The common pleas court had no opportunity to consider the impact of Ice on this case and our opinion in Foster. [read post]
The court of appeals erred in affirming the trial-court judgment on Williamscommon-law claim.Waffle House argued in the court of appeals that the TCHRA should also fail for various reasons if the common-law claim were reversed. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 12:08 pm
  (Williams, supra, 57 Cal.4th at pp. 783-784; People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:21 pm by MBettman
On September 26, 2014, judgment was entered on the jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiffs for $2,753,000 by Summit County Common Pleas Judge Mary Margaret Rowlands. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Williams, we posted that the writing was clearly on the wall to the effect that punitive damages had "peaked out" in American law.That conclusion was strongly supported in the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Exxon Valdez punitive damages case, Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]