Search for: "Williams v. Davie County"
Results 101 - 120
of 232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
See Battle Creek Health Sys. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
By William W. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:51 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In 2009, two same-sex couples (one from LA County and one from Alameda County) brought suit in federal court in San Francisco against, among others, the County Clerks in their respective counties, the Governor, the Attorney General and the State Registrar, alleging that Proposition 8 violated the federal Constitution. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm
Flowers (5th Cir. 1990) (involving restrictions on the speech of governmental employees), and reiterated in In re Davis (Tex. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:40 pm
In 2006, he gave Hall County Sheriff's officials the address for Good News at Noon, a Gainesville shelter located on Davis Street.According to the summary, Santos was kicked out of the shelter in July 2006 and never registered another address with officials. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
" In William Curtis, Gary Stewart and Walter Raines v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s oral argument on Tuesday in Perry v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 9:32 pm
Davis, says state salaried professionals, including lawyers, can't be paid during the current budget impasse. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
On the same days, Heather Williams J heard the libel trial in the case of Mehmood v Up and Coming TV Limited. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:51 pm
Or Washington v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 5:11 am
Ellis has posted "Polley v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Baum, City Attorney, William B. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
In the seminal McCulloch v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:01 am
LDF has more information on Abu-Jamal v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 10:59 am
Davis v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
William R. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
GUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 10:38 am
District Judge William T. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Like other factual findings in the trial court, the Supreme Court defers to these findings as to predominant motive.Finally, the fact that relevant portions of the Voting Rights Act on which the Arizona districting commission relied have since been held unconstitutional in Shelby County v. [read post]
