Search for: "Williams v. Does"
Results 21 - 40
of 7,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2013, 12:05 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
Williams v The Trustees of Swansea University Pension & Assurance Scheme and another [2018] UKSC 65 was handed down on 17 Dec 2018. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 1:10 pm
Does 1-7, the Newport News, Virginia, case, targeting 7 students at the College of William and Mary, Judge F. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 12:25 pm
Last Fall Steve posted about United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 10:49 am
Williams v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:26 am
In Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:47 am
Despite the sturm und drang with which the defense bar greeted the Supreme Court’s decision on Monday in Williams v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 11:36 am
Williams. [read post]
8 Feb 2006, 10:23 am
Williams does not mean that a sentence outside of the Guidelines range - either higher or lower - is presumptively unreasonable. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:20 am
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Registration as sex offender In October 2009, John Doe, appellant, pleaded guilty to three counts of aggravated sexual battery, one count of rape, and one count of forcible sodomy in the Circuit Court of Prince William County, Virginia. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
See Williams v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:26 am
Until it does so, the net result of Williams is to substantially increase that confusion. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 3:06 pm
TCYK, LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 8:55 am
On January 20, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:27 am
" If Williams does not fall under this exemption (the "Motor Carrier Act" exemption), it is undisputed that he is entitled to overtime pay. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:08 pm
S.C., July 13, 2017, Williams v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 5:42 am
On the face of it therefore, Williams’ claim was time-barred. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 3:27 pm
(Bennett v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 11:58 am
Sisler.What the article does not mention is that the lawyers in Hughes v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
Moreover, well before Marbury v. [read post]
