Search for: "Williams v. Graham" Results 21 - 40 of 317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2010, 7:59 pm by Anna Christensen
Harris Associates, we have added a link to Tuesday’s decision and a recap by Stanford Law School’s Connor Williams, while the case page for Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
And as Rishi Sunak becomes the sixth Prime Minister since we started this blog… When cancelling an event unilaterally amounts to discrimination In Billy Graham Evangelistic Association Against Scottish Event Campus Ltd [2022] SC GLW 33, Franklin Graham – the son of Dr Billy Graham – had been due to appear at the Hydro in Glasgow venue in May 2020 as part of a UK tour under the auspices of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association (BGEA). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:25 am by dennis l. hall
Here is the Third Circuit case: WILLIAM GRAHAM COMPANY v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:25 am by dennis l. hall
Here is the Third Circuit case: WILLIAM GRAHAM COMPANY v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:57 am by Florian Mueller
[BREAKING NEWS -- please check back soon for more detail in a follow-up post that will be based on the official recording of today's appellate hearing]Two highly experienced litigation reporters who attended today's Oracle v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
In a series of blogposts and evidence to the House of Lords Communications Committee William Perrin and Professor Lorna Woods suggest that the answer should be yes. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
Down in DC, the Supreme Court accepted cert in a followup to its decision last year in Graham v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:45 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership, which examines whether the invalidity defense of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 11:05 am by Terry Hart
In response, UIRC filed a copyright infringement suit against William Blair. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:48 am
She emphasised that the question of copying is one of quality, not quantity (Ladbrokes v William Hill) and that a substantial part of a work will have been copied if the parts taken express the intellectual creation of the author (Infopaq). [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:51 am
The defendants argued that the relator’s allegations were disclosed in three ways, each of which the Court rejected: To the state Department of Health and Welfare (Judge Shubb ruled that, under Ninth Circuit precedent, disclosure to a state fraud investigator cannot constitute a public disclosure); During an audit by the state agency (the Court noted the pending case of Graham County Soil & Water Dist. v. [read post]