Search for: "Williams v. Kennedy" Results 101 - 120 of 1,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2015, 8:04 am
Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court (except as to Part II of his opinion) in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:25 am by William Gould
   Perhaps significantly, at one point Kennedy remarked to William Messenger, counsel for respondent Martin Mulhall, that Mulhall’s position seemed to be at odds with “well accepted practices and understandings” — i.e., presumably the practice of neutrality agreement negotiation along with Supreme Court precedents approving of compulsory union recognition when a secret ballot box election was not present. [read post]
11 May 2007, 1:43 pm
In the USA Today, Joan Biskupic has this piece on Justice Kennedy, "the most significant vote on the court these days. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:49 am by Dennis Crouch
In 2002, the Supreme Court denied cert. in Williams over the dissent of Justice Breyer, joined by Justices Scalia and Kennedy. [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:19 pm
  For example, I wish the Court might be willing to reconsider its now 60-year-old sentencing due process  ruling in Williams v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 5:43 am
" These four were just one vote away in Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:20 pm by Katie Bart
The Supreme Court’s October 2019 term begins Monday at 10 a.m., with oral argument in Kahler v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:42 am by Lawrence Baum
In itself, the Supreme Court’s decision in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm by Ronald Collins
— Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Oral arguments in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
At The Hill, Brett Samuels reports that an “adviser to President Trump on judicial issues said Sunday that the choice to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy is not about whether the pick will overturn Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:26 am by Ryan Harvey
United States, holding that Petitioner William Freeman could move for a sentence reduction because of retroactive amendments to the crack guidelines.In United States v. [read post]