Search for: "Williams v. Mahan"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2011, 11:51 am
The prosecution responded by arguing that the information Mahan sought was not subject to discovery under Ohio Rule 16: [T]he state indicated Peer Spectre is maintained under the strict control and ownership of William Wiltse and is restricted to use by law enforcement. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:38 am
And Williams makes fairly clear that a defendant is entitled to a pretrial hearing on the admissibility of 404(B) evidence. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 12:59 pm
Ohio In Philip Randolph Institute v. [read post]
