Search for: "Williams v. Marks" Results 1 - 20 of 2,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2015, 8:11 am by Howard Wasserman
Williams, Questions Marks: Plurality Decisions and Precedential Constraint, which discusses lower courts' misuse of Marks v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:26 pm
Justice Henderson's finding at first instance [2011] EWHC 62 (Ch) (21 Jan 2011) [2011] ETMR 21that Red's number mark had not been infringed but dismissed the appeal by the defendants, the William Hill group of companies (" [read post]
15 May 2010, 4:53 am by Seth
 Williams is represented by veteran trial lawyers Don Mark of Fafinski Mark & Johnson (where the [...] [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:26 am
Affirms $1.25 Millions Settlement of Action Against Raiders, about Lacy T. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 8:47 pm by Patent Docs
Mark Freeman, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:15 pm by Gene Quinn
On Friday, September 17, 2010, I had the opportunity to chat with Professor Mark Lemley, who is the William H. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 12:41 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court heard oral argument in McDonnell v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan and Andrew Williams -- Earlier today, the Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Sandoz Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 1:01 am by war
The relevant context, where the mark is a word mark, includes a consideration of the way in which the word has been displayed in relation to the goods and advertisements of which complaint is made: Mars GB Ltd v Cadbury Ltd [1987] RPC 387 at 402, per Whitford J. [read post]