Search for: "Williams v. Potter" Results 1 - 20 of 129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Legal Aggregate
Professor of Law, and Faculty Co-Director, Stanford Criminal Justice Center Justice O’Connor took the seat of Justice Potter Stewart. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
Shortly after taking office, he had an opportunity to do that, with Justice Potter Stewart’s announcement in June 1981 that he would retire in early July. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Welcome to this all-source repository of information for analysts, researchers, investigators, journalists, educators, and the public at large. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
Which light links Latin scholars with Harry Potter? [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
Aviva Investors Ground Rent GP Ltd and another v Williams and others, heard 8th December 2022                   [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:03 am by Scott Bomboy
“Plaintiffs rely heavily on the plurality opinion of Justice [William] Brennan in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:01 am by Emma Kent
Quand la Loi britannique de 2004 sur le partenariat civil (Civil Partnership Act 2004) est entrée en vigueur le 5 décembre 2005, son objectif était de permettre aux couples de même sexe d’obtenir la reconnaissance légale de leur relation en créant  « une institution égalisante et parallèle » (traduction) du partenariat civil. 14 ans plus tard, l’exigence selon laquelle le mariage doit être contracté… [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Emma Kent
Data is not available for 2020 and 2021. [11] Section 218 of the Act. [12] Wilkinson v Kitzinger (No 2) [2007] 1 FLR 295, per Sir Mark Potter P at [50]. [13] See paragraph 21(2)(d) of Schedule 5; paragraph 5(2)(d) of Schedule 6; and paragraph 10(3)(a) of Schedule 7. [14] GW v RW (Financial Provision: Departure from Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108; IX v IY [2018] EWHC 3053 per Williams J at [68]; MB v EB [2019] EWHC 1649. [15] Levin, I. (2004). [read post]