Search for: "Williams v. State of Oregon"
Results 1 - 20
of 369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2009, 8:41 pm
On March 31 the Supreme Cout of the United States dismissed the writ of certiorari as impovidently granted in Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 12:22 pm
Unanimous Supreme Court of Oregon holds that cigarette manufacturer Philip Morris owes State of Oregon over $99 million representing that state's statutory share of the punitive damages awarded to the plaintiff in Williams v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
When the Oregon Supreme Court thumbed its nose at the directives from the US Supremes in Philip Morris v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 4:02 pm
Williams. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 9:14 pm
Williams. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 4:40 pm
Philip Morris U.S.A. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 3:47 pm
(See, e.g., Orient Handel v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 11:10 am
Williams. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 6:18 am
Williams v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 5:22 pm
As Bashman notes, the Oregon court held that the trial court properly refused Philip Morris's proposed punitive damages instruction, even though it correctly stated that the jury should not punish for harm to nonparties, because it also included some language that was erroneous under Oregon state law. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
Before the Oregon Supreme Court gets to that issue, however, it will decide Schwarz v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:06 am
Williams (Williams III), which was argued last December (click here to view the transcript). [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 4:25 pm
Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm
One of our readers then alerted me to the Oregon Supreme Court's opinion last week in Strawn v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:08 am
William Hines was intrigued by the creative approach that the Oregon Supreme Court followed in 2008 when reaffirming a 97-to-1 punitive award against Philip Morris after the United States Supreme Court decision in Philip Morris v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 5:50 am
Only weeks after its opinion in Williams v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 2:34 pm
Williams (Williams III), as well as the respondent's brief on the merits. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Williams (07-1216), on whether the Oregon Supreme Court improperly upheld a $79.5 million punitive damage upward under a state procedural rule. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
