Search for: "Williams v. Strickland" Results 61 - 80 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm by Steve Vladeck
Although the district court denied relief (concluding that Wilson could not demonstrate “prejudice” under the Supreme Court’s Strickland v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
Strickland, 321 N.C. 31, 39, 361 S.E.2d 882, 886–87 (1987) (prior assaults); Morgan, 315 N.C. at 635, 340 S.E.2d at 90 (same); but see State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm by cdw
”  [via Lexisone] Donald William Dufour v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
Shaw, 13-897, a state-on-top habeas case that asked whether, in an ineffective assistance claim, “a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice” under Strickland v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Strickland    Northern District of Ohio at ClevelandSUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
  Rounding out the reruns is Williams v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
” The Florida Supreme Court, 5-2, in Kirk Douglas Williams v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
Williams, 11-465) – both one-time relists in which the Court denied cert. yesterday. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am by cdw
Strickland in Ohio has granted a commutation to Sidney Cornwell, which means, save for the Baze v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:55 pm by cdw
  “Given the evidence presented at the PCRA hearing, we cannot conclude [trial counsel's] investigation met his responsibility under Strickland, as further explained in Williams and Wiggins, to pursue all reasonable avenues for developing mitigation evidence. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
Wiggins: Standby counsel appointed by Court does not violate self-representation right. 1984 Strickland v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:20 pm by cdw
From this week’s edition: Leading off this edition is the Supreme Court’s sweeping, albeit noncapital, decision in Padilla v. [read post]