Search for: "Williams v. Superior Court (People) (1989)" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2008, 5:43 pm
Georgia (1972) 408 U.S. 238, until rendered moot by the California Supreme Court decision in People v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Further discussion of the desirability (or otherwise) of abolishing appeals to the Privy Council arose: in 1978 in the Report of the Royal Commission on the Courts; in 1989 in a Law Commission Paper on the Structure of the Courts; in 1995 in a report by the Solicitor General to the Cabinet Strategy Committee on court structures; in a Discussion Paper called “Reshaping New Zealand’s Appeal Structure” issued in 2000 by the Attorney General; and in… [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 12:02 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
William Osburn; 2007 Mealey’s CA Jury Verdicts & Settlements 296 Lucasfilm Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
At trial, plaintiff alleged that the City was liable under a respondeat superior theory for Miller's negligence in shooting plaintiff and for the police department's negligence in planning the raid. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
At trial, plaintiff alleged that the City was liable under a respondeat superior theory for Miller's negligence in shooting plaintiff and for the police department's negligence in planning the raid. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  Once general principles of institutional structures are understood, it is possible to contextualize these insights within the realities of the American Republic--the general government, the administrative branches, inferior political units, and the residuary role of the people as ultimate sovereigns. [read post]