Search for: "Williams v. United Parcel Servs." Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2007, 3:18 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc. (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1, 12.) [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
”12 As Householder explains: It would be similarly fallacious to say that in a real estate transaction, the money paid to the seller is only a secondary consideration, with the primary value of the transaction consisting of the conveyance of the parcel to the buyer. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
This language, which only served to distinguish a pecuniary interest from a general interest, transmogrified into a declaration of the interest itself. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:09 am by Joy Waltemath
United Parcel Serv., the Sixth Circuit held that additional leave is an objectively unreasonable accommodation where an employee has already received significant amounts of leave and has demonstrated “no clear prospects for recovery. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm by Ronald Collins
His passing meant that I had to find a different way to address Citizens United in the book. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 11:24 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc.Court: U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-30854  October 19, 2011 Judge: Stewart Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment Law Plaintiff brought suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12102, against defendant for failing to provide a reasonable employment accommodation in consideration of his diabetes. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:52 pm
Jefferson--my favorite president in US History.Eric Muller posted a "cool" letter he found relating to the Gibbons v. [read post]
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]