Search for: "Williams-Sonoma Song-Beverly Act Cases"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2009, 7:48 pm
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., ___ Cal. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:48 am
Williams-Sonoma [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:05 am
Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Class Action Complaint because Retailer Request for ZIP Codes Violated Song-Beverly Consumer Protection Statute California Supreme Court Holds Plaintiff filed a putative class action against retailer Williams-Sonoma alleging that it violated California’s Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (one of the State’s consumer protection statutes) by asking her for her ZIP code at the time of her… [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 12:00 am
Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Class Action Complaint because Retailer Request for ZIP Codes Violated Song-Beverly Consumer Protection Statute California Supreme Court Holds Plaintiff filed a putative class action against retailer Williams-Sonoma alleging that it violated California’s Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (one of the State’s consumer protection statutes) by asking her for her ZIP code at the time of… [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm
Class actions alleging a violation of the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act have targeted not only traditional “brick-and-mortar” retailers like Williams Sonoma but also online retailers. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:33 am
The Restriction Statute differs critically from California’s Song-Beverly in that New Jersey’s Restriction Statute only applies to information being “required,” whereas Song-Beverly also applies to a “request. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:19 am
The Restriction Statute differs critically from California’s Song-Beverly in that New Jersey’s Restriction Statute only applies to information being “required,” whereas Song-Beverly also applies to a “request. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:45 am
Williams-Sonoma, S178241 (Cal. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:36 am
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc. decision in 2011. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., holding that, under the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (Cal. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 3:43 pm
Both involve claims under the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:46 am
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., which held that for purposes of the Song-Beverly Act, ZIP codes constitute “personal identification information” (PII). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:17 am
Chevron that a gas station gathering ZIP Codes for fraud prevention did not violate Civil Code § 1747.08, the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act (“Credit Card Act”). [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:06 am
That case against Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 7:57 am
That case against Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:46 pm
William Sonoma, __ Cal. 4th__ (February 10, 2011), holding that ZIP codes are “personal identification information” for the purposes of the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:52 pm
William Sonoma, __ Cal. 4th__ (February 10, 2011), holding that ZIP codes are "personal identification information” for the purposes of the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:24 pm
Writing for a unanimous court, Justice Morena found that ZIP codes are “personal identification information” for the purposes of the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act (“Credit Card Act “). [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:52 pm
Pineda’s suit alleged that such action violates California’s Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971, which states that retailers may not collect and store personally identifiable information from cardholders in credit card transactions. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:52 pm
Pineda’s suit alleged that such action violates California’s Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971, which states that retailers may not collect and store personally identifiable information from cardholders in credit card transactions. [read post]
