Search for: "Williamson v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 966
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A notable example of this is Indian courts’ affirmation of the proportionality standard, even though the actual test deployed is often, in practice, a weaker and more deferential form of review, including variations on the British concept of Wednesbury unreasonableness (a deferential form of review similar to the American approach in Williamson v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Former cabinet minister Sir Gavin Williamson has been ordered to apologise after an inquiry found he had bullied a colleague in texts. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 12:43 pm by Ilya Somin
Township of Scott (2019), the the Supreme Court reversed Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 2:47 am by Mavrick Law Firm
As the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida explained in Furmanite Am., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm by Josh Blackman
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133–35 (2000). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The continuous representation toll ends upon the conclusion of the matter or upon the attorney’s withdrawal from representation (see Shumsky, 96 NY2d at 170-171; Williamson ex rel. [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:51 am by Unknown
A third trustee, Joseph Masella, agreed to settle charges that he caused and willfully counseled the fund’s violations (SEC v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
John the Evangelist Killingworth, supra, in which the Chancellor stated: “[53]. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]