Search for: "Wills v. Wills" Results 81 - 100 of 18,360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2007, 2:11 pm
To succeed the claimant must prove:1. that claimant enriched (in other words benefited) the deceased;2. that the claimant suffered a corresponding depravation (gave up something or contributed labour); and3. that there is no juristic reason for the enrichment (such as a contract or a gift.)In a Wills Variation Act claim, the court can take into account any unjust enrichment in deciding whether to vary the will in favour of the claimant.Wilcox v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
” In concluding that Section 533 precludes coverage for the malicious prosecution claim against the law firm, the appellate court relied heavily on Downey Venture v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 9:45 am by Paul Fling
Specifically, the Court answered the question, posed in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:39 am
A recent case in the New York State Supreme Court, Onondoga County, Castor v. [read post]