Search for: "Wilson & Walker v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2020, 12:16 pm
Criminal procedure — Arraignment — Self-representation The appellant, Charles Kenneth Walker, was convicted by Judge Brett R. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:15 am
See this commentary by Walker Lewis. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
Starting today in the Supreme Court is the appeal of Ministry of Defence v AB & Ors, which will be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson over three and a half days. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am
In Courtroom 1 this morning until Tuesday 10 July 2012 is the appeal of BCL Old Co Ltd & ors v BASF plc & ors, to be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Clarke, and Wilson. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am
Starting on Tuesday 7 February 2012 is the two day hearing in front of a panel of seven (Lady Kerr and Lords Phillips, Walker, Kerr, Brown, Dyson and Wilson) of R (KM) (by his mother and litigation friend JM) v Cambridgeshire County Council. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:10 am
Celeste Walker v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
Running from Monday 16 July 2012 until Wednesday 18 July 2012 in the Supreme Court are the linked appeals of Day & anor v Hosebay Ltd and Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Lexgorge Ltd, in front of a panel of seven (L Phillips,L Walker, L Mance, L Clarke, L Wilson, L Sumption and L Carnwath). [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
There is only one Supreme Court appeal in the second week of the Easter Term, commencing with a two-day hearing of Autoclenz Limited v Belcher and others to be heard by Lords Hope, Walker, Collins, Clarke and Sir Nicholas Wilson on Wednesday 11 and Thursday 12 May 2011. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
Southern Pacific Securities 05-2 Plc v Walker & Anor [2010] UKSC 32 A brief note on this case, which concerned the enforceability of a credit agreement secured on the Walker's property. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
Southern Pacific Securities 05-2 Plc v Walker & Anor [2010] UKSC 32 A brief note on this case, which concerned the enforceability of a credit agreement secured on the Walker's property. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
The conjoined appeals of Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence will be heard on Wednesday 22 and Thursday 23 June 2011 by a seven member panel consisting of Lords Phillips, Walker, Lady Hale, Lords Mance, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
On Friday 4 November the matter of Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor will be heard in Courtroom 2 by Lady Hale and Lords Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
On Wednesday 9 October Deenish Benjamin and Deochan Ganga v The State of Trinidad and Tobago will be heard by Dame Heather Hallett and Lords Phillips, Kerr, Clarke and Wilson. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am
Lords Phillips and Walker did not comment on the issue. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
Supreme Court judgment (i) Construction of Schedule 1 A five-justice panel of Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown Mance and Wilson unanimously dismissed the appeal, despite adopting slightly different positions on the correct construction of the Schedule 1 provision. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
From Doe v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Concluding on the basis of previous authorities that ‘attributability’ had been interpreted as requiring a ‘real possibility of a causal link’ (para 35), Lord Walker expressed the view that it was therefore a legal impossibility for a claimant to lack knowledge of attributability once the claim had been issued, given that the claim form contained a statement of truth which stated as much (see also per Lord Wilson at para 3). [read post]
